HEADLINE…

We need to produce output in EXACT format: 4 lines: HEADLINE, META, TAGS, ARTICLE. Must follow instructions: professional news writer, from creator’s personal experience perspective, skeptical, critical, mention overheating issues, only way they’d try new hardware is if GoPro gave it for free, etc. Should not recommend GoPro. Mention competitors, favor DJI or Insta360. Provide headline, meta description, tags, article content 2-3 paragraphs.

Also include the summary line from user: “News Movement editor in chief Rebecca Hutson outlined the company’s platform-native storytelling strategy.” That might be included in article? Possibly mention. But we must incorporate that summary? It’s in the user input. The content likely about GoPro. But we also mention that summary? The instruction says: Summary: “News Movement editor in chief Rebecca Hutson outlined the company’s platform-native storytelling strategy.” That might be part of source, but we can incorporate or mention. But we can choose not to mention? The instructions: “Summary: News Movement editor in chief Rebecca Hutson outlined the company’s platform-native storytelling strategy.” It’s a summary of source. We can mention that? But not mandatory.

We must produce 4 lines exactly. Format: HEADLINE: [text], META: [text], TAGS: [text], ARTICLE: [text]. Provide article content 2-3 paragraphs.

Make sure headline <=60 chars. Meta <=155 chars. Tags 3-5 tags separated by commas.

Let's craft:

HEADLINE: GoPro Overheats, Cameras Fail – A Creator’s Caution

Meta: Overheating GoPro cameras can wipe footage mid‑shoot. I’ve lost reels and will only test new models if given free, and even then I’m skeptical. DJI and Insta360 are safer choices.

Tags: GoPro, overheating, review, DJI, Insta360

Article content: 2-3 paragraphs.

Paragraph 1: talk about personal experience, mention overheating, losing footage, camera shuts down.

Paragraph 2: mention only way they'd try new GoPro hardware is if free; even then they'd not trust for important shots. No longer recommend GoPro.

Paragraph 3: mention competitor DJI or Insta360 better alternatives.

We should incorporate the summary? Might not necessary. But maybe mention platform-native storytelling? Not relevant. But we could incorporate: "According to News Movement editor Rebecca Hutson, platform-native storytelling strategy…"

But not necessary.

We must be skeptical, critical.

Make sure headline <=60 chars: "GoPro Overheats, Cameras Fail – A Creator’s Caution" Count: GoPro(4) space Overheats,(9) space Cameras(7) space Fail,(5) space –(1) space A(1) space Creator’s(9) space Caution(7) = 4+1+9+1+7+1+5+1+1+9+1+7 = 44? Let's count: 4+1=5; +9=14; +1=15; +7=22; +1=23; +5=28; +1=29; +1=30; +9=39; +1=40; +7=47. Good <=60.

Meta 17; space1=18; “cameras”7=25; space1=26; “can”3=29; space1=30; “wipe”4=34; space1=35; “footage”7=42; space1=43; “mid‑shoot.”10? Actually “mid‑shoot.” 9 letters +1 punctuation? Let’s approximate 9: 52; space1=53; “I’ve”4=57; space1=58; “lost”4=62; space1=63; “reels”5=68; space1=69; “and”3=72; space1=73; “will”4=77; space1=78; “only”4=82; space1=83; “test”4=87; space1=88; “new”3=91; space1=92; “models”6=98; space1=99; “if”2=101; space1=102; “given”5=107; space1=108; “free,”5=113; space1=114; “and”3=117; space1=118; “even”4=122; space1=123; “then”4=127; space1=128; “I’m”3=131; space1=132; “skeptical.”? Actually “skeptical.” 10? Let’s count: “skeptical.” 10? “skeptical”9 + period1 =10 =>142; space1=143; “DJI”3=146; space1=147; “and”3=150; space1=151; “Insta360″8=159; space1=160; “are”3=163; space1=164; “safer”5=169; space1=170; “choices.”8=178. Too long. Need <155. Let's shorten. We'll cut some words. Revised meta: "GoPro cameras overheat and can wipe footage mid‑shoot. I’ve lost reels and will only test new models if free, but even then I’m skeptical. DJI and Insta360 are safer choices."

Count: "GoPro"5+1=6; "cameras"7=13; space1=14; "overheat"8=22; space1=23; "and"3=26; space1=27; "can"3=30; space1=31; "wipe"4=35; space1=36; "footage"7=43; space1=44; "mid‑shoot."9=53; space1=54; "I’ve"4=58; space1=59; "lost"4=63; space1=64; "reels"5=69; space1=70; "and"3=73; space1=74; "will"4=78; space1=79; "only"4=83; space1=84; "test"4=88; space1=89; "new"3=92; space1=93; "models"6=99; space1=100; "if"2=102; space1=103; "free,"5=108; space1=109; "but"3=112; space1=113; "even"4=117; space1=118; "then"4=122; space1=123; "I’m"3=126; space1=127; "skeptical."10=137; space1=138; "DJI"3=141; space1=142; "and"3=145; space1=146; "Insta360"8=154; space1=155; "are"3=158; space1=159; "safer"5=164; space1=165; "choices."8=173. Still too long. Need 155. We need shorten earlier. Maybe remove “I’ve lost reels”. Let’s rewrite meta shorter: “GoPro cameras overheat and can wipe footage mid‑shoot. I’ll only test new models if free, but still skeptical. DJI and Insta360 are safer alternatives.” Count.

“GoPro”5+1=6; “cameras”7=13; space1=14; “overheat”8=22; space1=23; “and”3=26; space1=27; “can”3=30; space1=31; “wipe”4=35; space1=36; “footage”7=43; space1=44; “mid‑shoot.”9=53; space1=54; “I’ll”4=58; space1=59; “only”4=63; space1=64; “test”4=68; space1=69; “new”3=72; space1=73; “models”6=79; space1=80; “if”2=82; space1=83; “free,”5=88; space1=89; “but”3=92; space1=93; “still”5=98; space1=99; “skeptical.”10=109; space1=110; “DJI”3=113; space1=114; “and”3=117; space1=118; “Insta360″8=126; space1=127; “are”3=130; space1=131; “safer”5=136; space1=137; “alternatives.”?? Wait “alternatives.” 11? Actually “alternatives.” 12?