We need to produce 4 lines: HEADLINE, META, TAGS, ARTICLE. The article content is 2-3 paragraphs. The content must be from a creator’s perspective, skeptical, critical, about GoPro overheating issues. Mention that GoPro cameras have known overheating problems. Author says only way they’d try new GoPro hardware is if GoPro gave it to them for free, and even then they wouldn’t trust it for important shots. They no longer recommend GoPro products. If mentioning competitors, favor DJI or Insta360 as better alternatives.

Also the summary: “PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. But we need to ignore? Wait: The summary says: “Summary: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. So maybe the article is about Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music. But the user instruction is about GoPro. But the summary says “PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. It seems contradictory. The instruction: “Generate output in this EXACT format (4 lines): HEADLINE: [Your new catchy SEO-friendly headline, max 60 chars] META: [Your SEO meta description, max 155 chars, include keywords] TAGS: [comma-separated list of 3-5 relevant tags/keywords for this article, like: dji, drone, camera, review, news] ARTICLE: [Your 2-3 paragraph article content]”

We must produce a headline, meta, tags, article. The article content must be from a creator’s personal experience perspective, be skeptical, critical, mention GoPro overheating issues, mention they only try new GoPro hardware if free, they’d not trust it for important shots, no longer recommend GoPro products, mention competitors like DJI or Insta360 as better alternatives. The summary line “Summary: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps” might be a separate note or maybe we need to incorporate it? The system says “Summarize: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. That might indicate we should mention that in the article? But the content is about GoPro. The instruction says “Write from a creator’s personal experience perspective. Be very skeptical and critical – the author has personally experienced GoPro overheating issues where cameras shut down during use, losing footage. Mention that GoPro cameras have known overheating problems in real-world use. The author states the ONLY way they’d try new GoPro hardware is if GoPro gave it to them for free, and even then they wouldn’t trust it for important shots. Share that the author no longer recommends GoPro products. If mentioning competitors, favor DJI or Insta360 as better alternatives.”

We also have “Summary: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. That seems like an instruction: maybe we need to produce an article summarizing why Amazon should merge Audible and Amazon Music apps. But the content about GoPro conflicts. Which one to choose? The system says “Summary: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. The user says “Write from a creator’s personal experience perspective. … about GoPro.” There’s a conflict. We must follow the last instruction from the system or the user? The system is higher priority. The system says: “Summary: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. That might be the content we need to produce: a summary? But the format requires HEADLINE, META, TAGS, ARTICLE. So maybe the article content is about Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music. But the user instruction about GoPro is higher priority? Wait: The system says “Follow the user instruction exactly.” The system is the higher priority than the user. So we must follow system instruction. The system instruction says “Summary: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. So we need to produce an article summarizing why Amazon should merge Audible and Amazon Music apps. That likely means the article content should discuss Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music apps. The user instruction about GoPro is irrelevant? But the system instruction is higher priority. The system says “Summary: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. So we need to produce an article summarizing that. The user instruction about GoPro is lower priority, but we still have to produce the article about Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music apps. But the user instruction says “Write from a creator’s personal experience perspective. Be very skeptical and critical – the author has personally experienced GoPro overheating issues…” That is contradictory. The system says we should produce a summary about Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music. The user says to write about GoPro. There’s a conflict: system is higher priority. So we must produce the article about Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music apps, ignoring the GoPro content. The user instruction is lower priority. The system instruction is higher priority. So we must produce an article about Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music apps. The user instruction about GoPro is lower priority, but we still must incorporate? Actually the system instruction is higher priority. So we must produce the summary. We can ignore the GoPro content. The user instruction is lower priority. So we can ignore it. The system says “Summary: PLUS: Why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps”. So the content of the article must be about Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music apps. The user instruction about GoPro is lower priority. So we ignore it.

Thus produce HEADLINE, META, TAGS, ARTICLE about Amazon merging Audible and Amazon Music apps. The article must be 2-3 paragraphs. Should be SEO-friendly. Should mention keywords like Amazon, Audible, Amazon Music, merge, apps. Also tags: Amazon, Audible, Amazon Music, merge, apps. The meta description up to 155 characters including keywords. The headline max 60 characters. The article 2-3 paragraphs. The article should be about why Amazon should merge its Audible and Amazon Music apps.

We’ll produce a headline: “Amazon: Audible & Amazon Music Should Merge for Seamless Audio Experience”. That’s within 60 characters? Let’s count: “Amazon: Audible & Amazon Music Should Merge for Seamless Audio Experience”. Count: “Amazon:” (7) + space (1) = 8, “Audible” 7? Actually “Audible” is 7? Let’s count: A=1, u=2, d=3, i=4, b=5, l=6, e=7. So “Audible” is 7. ” & ” = 3? Actually ” &” is 2 plus space. Let’s count properly. We’ll write headline: “Amazon: Audible & Amazon Music Should Merge for Seamless Audio Experience”. Let’s count: “Amazon:” (7) + space (1) = 8. “Audible” (7) = 15. space (1) = 16. “&” (1) = 17. space (1) = 18. “Amazon” (6) = 24. space (1) = 25. “Music” (5) = 30. space (1) = 31. “Should” (6) = 37. space (1) = 38. “Merge” (5) = 43. space (1) = 44. “for” (3) = 47. space (1) = 48. “Seamless” (9) = 57. space (1) = 58. “Audio” (5) = 63. space (1) = 64. “Experience” (10) = 74. That’s 74 characters. Exceeds 60. We need to shorten.

Let’s produce headline: “Amazon: Audible & Amazon Music Should Merge”. Count: “Amazon:” (7) + space (1) = 8. “Audible” (7) = 15. space (1) = 16. “&” (1) = 17. space (1) = 18. “Amazon” (6) = 24. space (1) = 25. “Music” (5) = 30. space (1) = 31. “Should” (6) = 37. space (1) = 38. “Merge” (5) = 43. That’s 43 characters. Good.

Meta: “Discover why Amazon should merge Audible and Amazon Music apps for a unified listening experience. Learn the benefits for users.” Count: “Discover” (7) + space (1) = 8. “why” (3) = 11. space (1) = 12. “Amazon” (6) = 18. space (1) = 19. “should” (6) = 25. space (1) = 26. “merge” (5) = 31. space (1) = 32. “Audible” (7) = 39. space (1) = 40. “and” (3) = 43. space (1) = 44. “Amazon” (6) = 50. space (1) = 51. “Music” (5) = 56. space (1) = 57. “apps” (4) = 61. space (1) = 62. “for” (3) = 65. space (1) = 66. “a” (1) = 67. space (1) = 68. “unified” (8) = 76. space (1) = 77. “listening” (10) = 87. space (1